Faith Revolution

The Point of the 2nd Amendment

June 26, 2008 - Posted by Clifford Cartwright | General | | 5 Comments

5 Comments »

  1. Come one you chickens…….someone leave a comment! LOL!

    Comment by Kim | June 29, 2008

  2. Oh geez, I’ll bite……been looking for a Dennis Miller quote and can’t find it. Now. Let me say this is not my opinion. I’m just curious as to how you would respond. He basically said that when our founding fathers wrote this they were thinking in terms of black powder shot guns and not the sophisticated weaponry of today.
    Now to quote O’Reilly……what say you?

    Comment by Kim | June 30, 2008

  3. That is a rather illogical argument since black powder was the most sophisticated weaponry of that time. To make a logical comparison, I would have to have some nukes in the basement and a stealth fighter in my back yard. I don’t. But I think that it was the intent of the fathers to keep the citizens of individual states and the states themselves armed in order to keep the federal government in check.

    You have to understand that initially we were set up as a republic of free and independent states. As such, individuals were citizens of their state first and foremost and then the state was part of the union. The 13th amendment, which some claim was not properly ratified, made everyone citizens of the United States of America in stead of, or along with, thier state residency. Constitutionally, the only jurisdiction that the federal government should have is over DC and non-state territories. Power is (should be) vested in the people and in the individual states. So maybe states and individuals should be as well armed as the federal govt. —using the logic of Dennis Miller’s argument.

    Comment by Clifford Cartwright | June 30, 2008

  4. RIGHT ON CLIFF

    Comment by MOM | July 3, 2008

  5. An update has politely been requested by the Golden Girls…….LOL.

    Comment by Kim | July 7, 2008

Leave a comment