Faith Revolution

Introspection

The Thinker

“Only the individual who has come to terms with his self can have a dispassionate attitude toward the world.” ~ Eric Hoffer

I have learned some things about myself this past week.

Time to consider.

Time to reflect.

Time to change.

April 20, 2007 Posted by Clifford Cartwright | General | | No Comments

The Logic

This is a follow up to the last post.  I want to state at the beginning that I am not writing for or against Don Imus.  I also want to emphatically state that the Rutgers girls basketball team are not “nappy-headed hoes.”  I will use that term in this post, not to create more offense, but only for illustration purposes.

I think that we are creating a real problem for ourselves as a society.  Will you allow me to try to illustrate this logically?

If one can make the statement that the Rutgers girls basketball team are not a bunch of “nappy-headed hoes” (which I just stated above), then logically, there must be someone somewhere that is or was a nappy-headed hoe.  My question is:  if in fact there are nappy-headed hoes, is it permissible to call them that?  If it is not permissible to call anyone that, then are we saying that they do not exist?  If they do not exist, then what is the issue with Imus?

If they do exist, then it is a legitimate term.   Who then determines who they are and who can and can’t be called a nappy-headed hoe?  Is that not a moral judgment?

Who is the arbiter?

Can we continue to live as a society without God?

April 14, 2007 Posted by Clifford Cartwright | Current Events/Politics, General | | 3 Comments

My Turn to be Thought Police

At the press conference of the Rutgers Women’s Basketball team in which they responded to Don Imus’s comments, Kia Vaughn is quoted in Time Magazine as saying “I’m a woman, and I’m someone’s child, I achieve a lot. And unless they’ve given this name, a ‘ho,’ a new definition, then that is not what I am.”

It could be understood from her statement that a “ho” is defined as someone who does not achieve a lot.  Could her statement be considered a slur against people who, in fact, do prostitute themselves for economic gain?  Is someone who hasn’t achieved as much then to be considered a “ho?” Is it permissible to say that about another person?

Just wondering.

April 12, 2007 Posted by Clifford Cartwright | Current Events/Politics | | 2 Comments

The Game Plan

Now I implore you, brothers, watch out for those who cause dissensions and pitfalls contrary to the doctrine you have learned. Avoid them; for such people do not serve our Lord Christ but their own appetites, and by smooth talk and flattering words deceive the hearts of the unsuspecting. ~Romans 16:17-18

One of my passions over many years, both as a lay person and as a pastor, has been the small church. This experience has supplied much anecdotal evidence and it is only recently that I have engaged in actual research. Recently, I completed some research on small churches. One of the particulars was the assimilation of a pastor into the family atmosphere and its effects on shared vision and conflict. In a previous blog, I shared a portion of an essay that I wrote concerning education in the small church. In that essay, I wrote how difficult it is for someone new to fit into a church that is steeped in tradition, written and unwritten rules and family power structure as evidenced, for example, by the plaques on the walls. Based on my recent research and long-term personal experience, I have hypothesized that there is a similar phenomenon occurring between churches and their pastors. In other words, does the success of a pastor in a particular church depend on the acceptance of the ruling class of people in the church? Must he submit to their rules and traditions in order to avoid serious long-term conflict (in some cases destruction) and despite his God given vision for the church? Research and experience have led me to identify a pattern of behavior that may be occurring in small churches that find themselves stagnating or dying with high pastoral turnover or an inability to call a pastor.

Not much has been written on the subject of pastor abuse. Redinger has written an article called entitled Clergy Killers and Haugk has written a book entitled Antagonists in the Church. Other than that, I have only run across a couple journal articles that deal with this subject.

It may seem wrong do deal with such issues. Could it possibly be that something this sinister is happening in many churches.? Unfortunately, I believe it is and those who have written on the subject agree. For reasons yet to be considered, churches have ignored much of the NT writings on the problem of evil within the church. We have been so focused on eliminating and avoiding evil outside the church, we have refused to address the evil within. Many of the NT passages that engage the discussion of evil are interpreted and applied as though the writer was addressing the unsaved, when in fact he was addressing those in the church.

It is my intention to research and write extensively on this subject. I am blogging on this tonight for the purpose of raising awareness, shining light on an unspeakable subject, encouraging pastors and getting insight. So if you have any experience in this area of pastor abuse, I would like to hear from you. If you know of any published writings on the subject, please let me know of them. Finally, I have attached a PDF document with a basic outline of what I have called the Game Plan. It is the play book that I believe is used by the majority of people who would destroy or at least hinder the ministry of a pastor for their own agenda. Although I may or may not respond, I would appreciate any feedback, either by commenting here or sending an email to emailcliff@verizon.net

Here is the outline:

The Game Plan PDF

April 12, 2007 Posted by Clifford Cartwright | Pastor/Church Related | | 2 Comments

The Wisdom of Calvin & Hobbes

Click to read

calvinandhobbesonai.jpg

evolution.gif

April 8, 2007 Posted by Clifford Cartwright | General | | No Comments